Founded in 1906, Liberty magazine continues to be the preeminent resource for matters of religious freedom.

About Us & Contact

Articles, Blog, Discussions, Audio & Video

Facebook, Twitter & Email Newsletter


Support Liberty

Your help will allow us to continue in our pursuit to maintain the religious freedoms we enjoy.

Donations »

Magazine Subscription »

Liberty Campaign Resources »


The Question

President Barack Obama recently ordered the Justice Department to stop defending the constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act, which defines marriage as only between a man and woman. “Classifications based on sexual orientation should be subject to a more heightened standard of scrutiny," said Attorney General Eric Holder, and the key provisions in the law "fails to meet that standard and is therefore unconstitutional." Do you agree with the administration that the act is unconstitutional (why or why not), and what, if any, implications may this have for religious liberty?


Obama Administration Changes Its Approach to the Defense of Marriage Act

Michael D. Peabody

Arguing against same-sex marriage in a legal manner in the courts is very difficult, as seen in the Proposition 8 Federal trial in California where opponents of the ban presented 8 witnesses and the proponents presented only 2, both of whom had previously publicly stated arguments in opposition to their testimony on the stand. Further, and more importantly, bans on same-sex marriage are difficult to defend without sucking other rights into the vortex.

Constitutional Arguments for Striking down DOMA

Alan E. Brownstein

In my judgment, DOMA is clearly unconstitutional. It violates both equal protection principles and the substantive due process right to marry. We need to be precise, however, about the consequences of striking down this federal law.

Twin Opposites: Same Sex Marriage and Abortion

Lincoln E. Steed

When discussing the recent news that the White House and the Justice Department will no longer be defending the Defense of Marriage Act, we might ask ourselves if our reaction would be any different if they made that announcement regarding Roe v. Wade. In some ways these are the twin opposites on legislative morality.

The Attack on Marriage now Undermines a Republican Form of Government

Alan J. Reinach

Set aside your ideas about marriage, just for the moment, if it is even possible to avoid emotional responses to a discussion of the legal issues swirling around marriage. Regardless of your views about whether marriage should be restricted to a man and a woman, or should include same-sex couples, the announcement by the Justice Department that it will no longer defend the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) is a genuinely frightening development.

Back to Top